Tan Shu Ann, Jolene

Tan Shu Ann, Jolene is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in companies act and statutory derivative action. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Financial Disclosure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Shu Ann, Jolene has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sterling Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	New Ping Ping Pauline v Eng’s Noodles House: Common Law Derivative Action & Fiduciary Duty(Jul 2021) Chng Kheng Chye v Kaefer Prostar: Statutory Derivative Action & Leave to Commence Suit(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Shu Ann, Jolene's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Shu Ann, Jolene's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	New Ping Ping Pauline v Eng’s Noodles House: Common Law Derivative Action & Fiduciary Duty 18 Jul 2021 New Ping Ping Pauline (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	18 Jul 2021	New Ping Ping Pauline (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed as the court found that the appellant was not entitled to rely on a common law derivative action.
2	Chng Kheng Chye v Kaefer Prostar: Statutory Derivative Action & Leave to Commence Suit 02 Sep 2020 Chng Kheng Chye (Applicant)Lost	02 Sep 2020	Chng Kheng Chye (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence a derivative action was dismissed. Costs for both applications were awarded to the respondents and fixed at S$8,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.