Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David

Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and chancery and equity. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in limitation and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Limitation	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Account	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Particular causes of action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proof of contents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Vicki Heng Law Corporation	7 cases	100% of cases	Fundamental Investors v. Palm Tree Investment: Loan Repayment & Estoppel(Apr 2020) Ang Bee Yian v Ang Siew Fah: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Trust Dispute over Investments & Property(Jul 2019) Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Debt Claim, Minority Oppression & Director's Duties(Jun 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	71%
Won	24.4 parties avg	4.4	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	44.1 parties avg	4.1
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Sia Khoon Kelvin David's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	729,686.92	145,937.385 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fundamental Investors v. Palm Tree Investment: Loan Repayment & Estoppel 16 Apr 2020 Palm Tree Investment Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Apr 2020	Palm Tree Investment Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim of estoppel was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ang Bee Yian v Ang Siew Fah: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Trust Dispute over Investments & Property 30 Jul 2019 Ang Siew Fah (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	30 Jul 2019	Ang Siew Fah (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Claims DismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's claims.
3	Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Debt Claim, Minority Oppression & Director's Duties 11 Jun 2019 Yak Thye Peng (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	11 Jun 2019	Yak Thye Peng (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim dismissedYTP's counterclaim was dismissed in its entirety.
4	Arpah bte Sabar v Colex Environmental: Work Injury Compensation for Death Due to Ischaemic Heart Disease 28 May 2019 Muhammad Faizzul bin Abu Samad (Claimant)Won	28 May 2019	Muhammad Faizzul bin Abu Samad (Claimant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, and the assessed sum of $181,421.73 is to be paid to the claimants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lim Ah Leh v Heng Fock Lin: Resulting Trust, Fiduciary Duties, and Limitation Act 11 Apr 2019 Lim Ah Leh (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	11 Apr 2019	Lim Ah Leh (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
6	Lim Ah Leh v Heng Fock Lin: Resulting Trust, Fiduciary Duties, Limitation Act 17 Jul 2018 Lim Ah Leh (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Jul 2018	Lim Ah Leh (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for an account was dismissed.
7	Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 07 Dec 2017 Yak Thye Peng (Defendant)Won	07 Dec 2017	Yak Thye Peng (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed, with costs of $4,000 awarded to the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.