Tan Siang Teck Kenneth

Tan Siang Teck Kenneth is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and strata titles. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building Maintenance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Siang Teck Kenneth has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Christopher Bridges Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Terigi v Hook: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer, and Employment Agreement Dispute(Jan 2023) MCST Plan No 2553 v Chia Yew Liang: Interpretation of Mixed-Use Development under BMSMA(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Siang Teck Kenneth's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.6
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Lost	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Siang Teck Kenneth's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Lost	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Terigi v Hook: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer, and Employment Agreement Dispute 25 Jan 2023 Hook, Laurence (Respondent)Dismissed	25 Jan 2023	Hook, Laurence (Respondent): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim for damages arising out of the loss of his shares dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	MCST Plan No 2553 v Chia Yew Liang: Interpretation of Mixed-Use Development under BMSMA 27 Nov 2022 Teng Khar Imm (Ding Qiaoyin) (Respondent)Lost	27 Nov 2022	Teng Khar Imm (Ding Qiaoyin) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed against Teng Khar Imm (Ding Qiaoyin) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).