Tan Silin Stephanie

Tan Silin Stephanie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in res judicata and stay of court proceedings. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Silin Stephanie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Silin Stephanie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ascendant Legal LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance(Mar 2021) BTN v BTP: Public Policy Exception & Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Oct 2020) Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Silin Stephanie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Silin Stephanie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance 11 Mar 2021 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Mar 2021	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCarlsberg's claim for repayment of the outstanding loan was dismissed as the court found that CSAPLH did not breach clause 2(c) of the Deed of Undertaking.
2	BTN v BTP: Public Policy Exception & Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 20 Oct 2020 BTQ (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Oct 2020	BTQ (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Carlsberg Breweries A/S v CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Loan Repayment Dispute Involving Arbitration Clause 03 Mar 2020 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Mar 2020	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings granted in partThe court ordered a stay in relation to all matters other than the clause 2(c) issues.
4	Materials Industry v. Vopak Terminals: Dispute over PME Cargo Disposal and Contractual Lien 27 Nov 2019 Vopak Terminals Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	27 Nov 2019	Vopak Terminals Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed.