Tan Siu-Lin

Tan Siu-Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and negligence. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated expertise across 53 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-operative care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Product Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fertility treatment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceuticals Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Products Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Urology	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Siu-Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Siu-Lin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	8 cases	89% of cases	Motor Image v SCDA: Dispute over Architect Fees under SIA Conditions of Appointment(Sep 2010) CIMB Bank v Dresdner Kleinwort: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law in Restitution Claim(Aug 2008) VV v VW: Setting Aside Costs Award in International Arbitration for Disproportionality(Jan 2008)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	11% of cases	Tan Hun Hoe v Harte Denis Mathew: Negligence, Damages, and Costs in Post-Operative Care(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Siu-Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	33%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	22%
Won	44.2 parties avg	4.2	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Siu-Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,356,439.28	169,554.918 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Motor Image v SCDA: Dispute over Architect Fees under SIA Conditions of Appointment 16 Sep 2010 Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	16 Sep 2010	Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	CIMB Bank v Dresdner Kleinwort: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law in Restitution Claim 07 Aug 2008 Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Aug 2008	Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against Dresdner's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	VV v VW: Setting Aside Costs Award in International Arbitration for Disproportionality 23 Jan 2008 VW (Defendant)Won	23 Jan 2008	VW (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the costs award was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	ET v ES: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Custody, and Maintenance Dispute 19 Sep 2007 ET (Petitioner)Partial	19 Sep 2007	ET (Petitioner): Joint custody of the two children of the marriage, sole care and control of the children, 35% of the value of the matrimonial assets, lump sum maintenance of S$1,000,000.00, monthly maintenance of $2,500.00 per month for each child, costs to be taxed if not agreedThe wife was granted joint custody, sole care and control, 35% of the matrimonial assets, lump sum maintenance of S$1,000,000.00, monthly maintenance of $2,500.00 per month for each child, and costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party: Defamation & Summary Judgment 30 Nov 2006 Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff)Won	30 Nov 2006	Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence 02 Oct 2003 De Cruz Andrea Heidi (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2003	De Cruz Andrea Heidi (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the second, third, and fourth defendants for the amounts computed above together with costs to be taxed or agreed. There is to be only one set of costs in respect of the second and third defendants. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
7	Koh Ewe Chee v Koh Hua Leong: Partnership Dispute & Property Ownership 10 Feb 2003 Koh Ewe Chee (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Feb 2003	Koh Ewe Chee (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claim that Sin Wah Seng was a sole proprietorship was dismissed. The court determined that Sin Wah Seng was a partnership with three equal partners and the properties in dispute were partnership assets to be shared equally, with a credit to the Plaintiff for lottery winnings used for renovations on one property. Costs awarded to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Koh Ewe Chee v Koh Hua Leong: Scope of 'Liberty to Apply' Order & Partnership Dissolution 02 May 2002 Koh Ewe Chee (Plaintiff)Lost	02 May 2002	Koh Ewe Chee (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed and paid by the plaintiff to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Tan Hun Hoe v Harte Denis Mathew: Negligence, Damages, and Costs in Post-Operative Care 12 Oct 2001 Harte Denis Mathew (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 Oct 2001	Harte Denis Mathew (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartMr. Harte's appeal was allowed in part, with increased damages awarded. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.