Tan Su Hui

Tan Su Hui is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and receivership. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Su Hui has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Su Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Su Hui has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	7 cases	100% of cases	Wibowo Boediono v Cristian Priwisata Yacob: Fraud, Misrepresentation, and Solicitors' Negligence(Jul 2018) Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Setting Aside Default Judgment(Apr 2018) Phang Choo Ong v Gilcom Investment: Stay of Winding Up Application(May 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Su Hui's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	43%
Won	45.4 parties avg	5.4	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Su Hui's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	2,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wibowo Boediono v Cristian Priwisata Yacob: Fraud, Misrepresentation, and Solicitors' Negligence 08 Jul 2018 Toh Wee Jin (Appellant)Won	08 Jul 2018	Toh Wee Jin (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; negligence claim dismissed.
2	Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Sze Siu Hung: Service Out of Jurisdiction and Setting Aside Default Judgment 26 Apr 2018 Sze Siu Hung (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Sze Siu Hung (Defendant, Appellant): Appeals DismissedDefendant's appeals and application to adduce further evidence dismissed.
3	Phang Choo Ong v Gilcom Investment: Stay of Winding Up Application 16 May 2016 LRG Investments Pte Ltd (Non-Party)Won	16 May 2016	LRG Investments Pte Ltd (Non-Party): Costs AwardedCosts of the application awarded to LRG fixed at S$8,000 inclusive of disbursements.
4	Chng Weng Wah v Goh Bak Heng: Laches & Trustee's Duty to Account for Shares 15 Feb 2016 Goh Bak Heng (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	15 Feb 2016	Goh Bak Heng (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for an account of the MTK shares and the sale proceeds is barred on the basis that the doctrine of laches applies. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Breach of Duty in Investment Advice Claim 25 Feb 2015 Koh Kim Teck (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	25 Feb 2015	Koh Kim Teck (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim was not struck out, and the Defendant's appeal was dismissed.
6	Motorola v Uzan: Revocation of Powers of Attorney & Receivership Order 28 Oct 2014 TAM CHEE CHONG (Other)Won	28 Oct 2014	TAM CHEE CHONG (Other): Order granted to revoke powers of attorneyOrder granted to revoke powers of attorney with effect from the date of the Receivership Order.
7	Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology: Minority Shareholder Rights & Corporate Mismanagement 08 Sep 2014 Sim City Technology Ltd (Respondent)Lost	08 Sep 2014	Sim City Technology Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's decision in favor of Sim City Technology Ltd.