Tan Tee Jim SC

Tan Tee Jim SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in charitable giving and patents. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Charity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Personality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inventorship	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Entitlement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Election of Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tee Jim SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Tee Jim SC has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	5 cases	100% of cases	Lian Chee Kek Buddhist Temple v Ong Ai Moi: Charity Proceedings, Legal Capacity, and Striking Out(Jun 2023) Amber Pharmacy v Lim: Riddick Principle, Document Discovery & Criminal Investigations(Nov 2019) Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital: Patent Ownership Dispute(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Tee Jim SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Tee Jim SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lian Chee Kek Buddhist Temple v Ong Ai Moi: Charity Proceedings, Legal Capacity, and Striking Out 18 Jun 2023 Tan Mary (Defendant, Appellant)Won	18 Jun 2023	Tan Mary (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar was allowed.
2	Amber Pharmacy v Lim: Riddick Principle, Document Discovery & Criminal Investigations 17 Nov 2019 Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Nov 2019	Amber Laboratories Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Implied undertaking modified to permit disclosure of documents revealing potential commission of Employment of Foreign Manpower Act offencesImplied undertaking modified to permit disclosure of documents revealing potential commission of Employment of Foreign Manpower Act offences. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital: Patent Ownership Dispute 27 Aug 2018 National University Hospital (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Neutral	27 Aug 2018	National University Hospital (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; National University Hospital remains a joint proprietor of the patent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	ABB Holdings v Sher Hock Guan Charles: Amendment of Statement of Claim and Restitutionary Damages 05 Sep 2010 ABB Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Sep 2010	ABB Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialApplication for leave to amend paragraph 14(f) of the Statement of Claim is refused; leave to amend paragraphs 14(d) and (e) is granted.
5	Louis Vuitton v City Chain: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Dilution 28 Jan 2009 City Chain Stores (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	28 Jan 2009	City Chain Stores (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Claims dismissedThe defendant's claims were dismissed. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff costs of the civil action. The Criminal Revision is dismissed with no order as to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.