Tan Tian Hui

Tan Tian Hui is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reverse Take-Over	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Property Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Tian Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Tian Hui has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	12 cases	100% of cases	Kok Kuan Hwa v Yap Wing Sang: Dispute over Chang Cheng Group Ownership & Control(Feb 2025) Founder Group v Singapore Commodities: Winding Up Stay & Payment Out Order Dispute(Oct 2024) Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Tian Hui's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 4 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.6 parties avg	3.6	50%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	8%
Won	35.4 parties avg	5.4	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	36.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	52.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Tian Hui's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(50%)	50%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Unknown	1(8%)	8%
Won	3(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,054,000.00	150,571.437 cases	7
USD	14,117,585.50	14,117,585.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Unknown: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kok Kuan Hwa v Yap Wing Sang: Dispute over Chang Cheng Group Ownership & Control 04 Feb 2025 Kok Kuan Hwa (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Feb 2025	Kok Kuan Hwa (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Founder Group v Singapore Commodities: Winding Up Stay & Payment Out Order Dispute 28 Oct 2024 Singapore Commodities Group Co, Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2024	Singapore Commodities Group Co, Pte Ltd (Defendant): Payment Out Order GrantedPayment Out Order granted in the amount of US$14,117,585.50 (assumed USD, as the debt was claimed in USD).
3	Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up, Disputed Debt & Arbitration 27 Nov 2023 Singapore JHC Co Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2023	Singapore JHC Co Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Winding Up OrderedJHC ordered to be wound up. Costs ordered against JHC and its directors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lim Siau Hing v Compass Consulting: Contractual Terms & Construction Rules in Reverse Takeover Dispute 23 Nov 2023 Lim Vhe Kai (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	23 Nov 2023	Lim Vhe Kai (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; not liable for bonus shares or cash fee.
5	Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up Application Dismissed Over Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement 28 May 2023 Singapore JHC Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 May 2023	Singapore JHC Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed with costs.
6	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case 07 Feb 2023 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Feb 2023	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Unfavorable determination of infringing product quantityCourt rejected Senda's expert opinion on the quantity of infringing products.
7	Compass Consulting v Lim Siau Hing: Contractual Terms & Statutory Illegality in RTO 19 Jan 2023 Lim Vhe Kai (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2023	Lim Vhe Kai (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against Defendant for damages fixed at $500,000 in respect of the Bonus Shares that Plaintiff was entitled to receive but did not receive (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal 05 Jul 2022 Senda International Capital Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Defendant)Lost	05 Jul 2022	Senda International Capital Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeals dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers 07 Sep 2021 Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Sep 2021	Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
10	Golden Hill Capital v Yihua Lifestyle: Appeal on Judicial Management & Asset Sale 29 Aug 2021 Phua Yong Tat (Applicant)	29 Aug 2021	Phua Yong Tat (Applicant): -
11	HTL International Holdings: Upholding Judicial Manager's Asset Sale Decision 14 Apr 2021 Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Other)Won	14 Apr 2021	Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Other): Costs AwardedCosts of S$18,000 awarded to the Phua Group (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology v Stansfield College: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in Education Collaboration 23 Oct 2018 Stansfield College Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Oct 2018	Stansfield College Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Dismissed in partCounterclaim dismissed save for one breach of contract by the plaintiff. Damages for the breach will be assessed separately.