Tan Wee En Aylwin

Tan Wee En Aylwin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and personal injury. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee En Aylwin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wee En Aylwin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mahmood Gaznavi & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Muhammad Hamdi v Toh Hwee Hong: Assessment of Damages for Fatal Road Accident Negligence(Oct 2017) Comptroller of Income Tax v BLO: Winding Up Application Dispute(Mar 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wee En Aylwin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wee En Aylwin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,255,687.65	627,843.832 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Muhammad Hamdi v Toh Hwee Hong: Assessment of Damages for Fatal Road Accident Negligence 18 Oct 2017 Muhammad Hamdi bin Ithnin (Plaintiff)Won	18 Oct 2017	Muhammad Hamdi bin Ithnin (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $104,291.64 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Comptroller of Income Tax v BLO: Winding Up Application Dispute 12 Mar 2017 BLO (Defendant)Lost	12 Mar 2017	BLO (Defendant): Winding up order made against DefendantApplication to wind up the Defendant granted. The amount of $1,151,396.01 represents the outstanding tax debt, including penalties imposed for non-payment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.