Tan Wee Kio Terence

Tan Wee Kio Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misrepresentation and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misrepresentation	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kio Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wee Kio Terence has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Chang Peng Hong Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Multiple Penalties Under Prevention of Corruption Act(Dec 2024) Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Oct 2022) Wang Fumin v Citibank: Negligence, Misrepresentation & Banking Advice(May 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wee Kio Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wee Kio Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,877,595.00	5,877,595.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chang Peng Hong Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Multiple Penalties Under Prevention of Corruption Act 03 Dec 2024 Chang Peng Hong Clarence (Applicant)Lost	03 Dec 2024	Chang Peng Hong Clarence (Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and the applicant's in-default imprisonment term was recalibrated upwards to 120 months. The applicant is required to pay a penalty of $5,877,595 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 11 Oct 2022 Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Oct 2022	Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant): Service out of jurisdiction order set asideService out of jurisdiction order in respect of the third defendant was set aside.
3	Wang Fumin v Citibank: Negligence, Misrepresentation & Banking Advice 11 May 2022 Citibank Singapore Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 May 2022	Citibank Singapore Ltd (Defendant): Claims dismissedThe plaintiff's claims against the defendant were dismissed.