Tan Wee Kong

Tan Wee Kong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Priorities of Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Payment out of proceeds of sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Carriage of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Kong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wee Kong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JLex LLC	4 cases	67% of cases	COSCO Shipping v PT OKI Pulp: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Scope(Mar 2024) COSCO Shipping v PT OKI Pulp: Jurisdiction in Limitation Action for Vessel-Jetty Contact(May 2023) The "Ambassador": Prioritizing Claims Against Vessel Proceeds in Admiralty Dispute(Jan 2023)
Legal Solutions LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Five Ocean Corp v Cingler Ship: Cargo Lien, Arbitration, & Interim Measures(Dec 2015) Marco Polo Shipping v Fairmacs Shipping: Conversion Claim for Undelivered River Sand(Aug 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wee Kong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.1
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	224.0 parties avg	24.0	33%
Neutral	33.7 parties avg	3.7	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	224.7 parties avg	24.7
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wee Kong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Neutral	3(50%)	50%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	62,950.00	62,950.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	COSCO Shipping v PT OKI Pulp: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Scope 27 Mar 2024 COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BV (Defendant)Neutral	27 Mar 2024	COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BV (Defendant): NeutralCOSCO Europe played no active role in SUM 2676 and did not object to it.
2	COSCO Shipping v PT OKI Pulp: Jurisdiction in Limitation Action for Vessel-Jetty Contact 21 May 2023 COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BV (Defendant)Neutral	21 May 2023	COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BV (Defendant): NeutralCOSCO Europe filed a notice of intention not to contest COSCO Shipping’s originating claim.
3	The "Ambassador": Prioritizing Claims Against Vessel Proceeds in Admiralty Dispute 04 Jan 2023 Island Oil Ltd (Intervener)Lost	04 Jan 2023	Island Oil Ltd (Intervener): Request for further arguments rejectedThe request for further arguments by Shipoil and Island Oil was rejected.
4	China Coal v Avra: Contract Formation Dispute over Coal Sale Agreement 19 Aug 2020 China Coal Solution (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2020	China Coal Solution (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of the trial and the appeal awarded to the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Five Ocean Corp v Cingler Ship: Cargo Lien, Arbitration, & Interim Measures 03 Dec 2015 Cingler Ship Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	03 Dec 2015	Cingler Ship Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders to provide documents to facilitate the sale of the CargoCingler Ship Pte Ltd was ordered to provide FOC’s solicitors with any documents in their possession, custody or control which may be required to facilitate the sale of the Cargo.
6	Marco Polo Shipping v Fairmacs Shipping: Conversion Claim for Undelivered River Sand 20 Aug 2015 FAIRMACS SHIPPING & TRANSPORT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (Respondent)Lost	20 Aug 2015	FAIRMACS SHIPPING & TRANSPORT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original award of US$62,950 restored. The currency is specified as USD in the judgment.