Tan Wee Meng

Tan Wee Meng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and patents. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in intellectual property law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Intellectual Property Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement proceedings	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wee Meng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	50% of cases	Institut Pasteur v Genelabs: HIV-2 Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Mar 2000)
Allen and Gledhill	1 cases	50% of cases	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation(May 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wee Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	100%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wee Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation 11 May 2005 M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	11 May 2005	M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claims dismissedClaims against M-Systems dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Institut Pasteur v Genelabs: HIV-2 Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 30 Mar 2000 Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	30 Mar 2000	Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; no damages or account of profits would be ordered against the Second Defendant by virtue of Section 69(1). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.