Tan Wee Soon

Tan Wee Soon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigating factors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
False Report	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Aggravating factors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wee Soon has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	56% of cases	PP v Mohammed Ali: Culpable Homicide & Genetic Screening in Child Death(Jan 2008) Public Prosecutor v Mark Kalaivanan: Rape and Abetment of Rape at Newton Hawker Centre(Aug 2003) Public Prosecutor v I and K: Sexual Assault and False Police Report Case(Aug 2003)
DPPs	2 cases	22% of cases	PP v ABC: Outrage of Modesty - Assessing Child Witness Testimony(Mar 2003) Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession(Mar 2003)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	11% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Shahary bin Sulaiman: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Jun 2004)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	11% of cases	PP v Lee Chez Kee: Murder, Common Intention, Robbery, Admissibility of Co-Accused Statements(Jan 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wee Soon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	92.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	62.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wee Soon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	9(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	6 6	Won: 6 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Mohammed Ali: Culpable Homicide & Genetic Screening in Child Death 30 Jan 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Jan 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and convicted for murder; death sentence imposed.
2	PP v Lee Chez Kee: Murder, Common Intention, Robbery, Admissibility of Co-Accused Statements 14 Jan 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Jan 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
3	Public Prosecutor v Shahary bin Sulaiman: Trafficking of Diamorphine 23 Jun 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Jun 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and convicted; mandatory death sentence imposed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mark Kalaivanan: Rape and Abetment of Rape at Newton Hawker Centre 10 Aug 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Aug 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as charged and convictedAll three accused were found guilty as charged and convicted.
5	Public Prosecutor v I and K: Sexual Assault and False Police Report Case 04 Aug 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Aug 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused were found guilty and sentenced.
6	PP v Huang Hong Si: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, and Mitigating Factors 10 Jul 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Jul 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): SentencedAccused sentenced to seven years imprisonment for culpable homicide and 12 months imprisonment for causing grievous hurt, to run concurrently.
7	PP v ABC: Outrage of Modesty - Assessing Child Witness Testimony 30 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	30 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the respondent was convicted on the fourth charge.
8	Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession 11 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking cannabis was dismissed.
9	Arun Prakash Vaithilingam v Public Prosecutor: Murder, Intention, and Defence of Sudden Fight 11 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal, maintaining the murder conviction.