Tan Wei Ser Venetia

Tan Wei Ser Venetia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admission of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement Negotiations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Admission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wei Ser Venetia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wei Ser Venetia has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications(Nov 2016) Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Disciplinary Proceedings for Non-Practicing Solicitor's Misconduct(Oct 2016) Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Misconduct Investigation of Non-Practicing Solicitor(Apr 2015)
CNPLaw LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	CJA v CIZ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award & Setting Aside - Singapore Arbitration Law(May 2022) CIZ v CJA: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Exceeding Jurisdiction on Consultancy Agreement Dispute(Jul 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wei Ser Venetia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wei Ser Venetia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	60,000.00	15,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CJA v CIZ: Recourse Against Arbitral Award & Setting Aside - Singapore Arbitration Law 16 May 2022 CJA (Appellant)Won	16 May 2022	CJA (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; legal costs of $60,000.00 awarded to the appellant in respect of the appeal and the hearing before the Judge, together with reasonable disbursements as agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CIZ v CJA: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Exceeding Jurisdiction on Consultancy Agreement Dispute 14 Jul 2021 CJA (Defendant)Lost	14 Jul 2021	CJA (Defendant): Appeal against decisionThe defendant's award relating to the X Opportunity was set aside, and the defendant has appealed against the decision.
3	The Enterprise Fund II Ltd v Jong Hee Sen: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 23 Nov 2016 The Enterprise Fund II Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Nov 2016	The Enterprise Fund II Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the defendant's appeals were allowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Disciplinary Proceedings for Non-Practicing Solicitor's Misconduct 26 Oct 2016 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	26 Oct 2016	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedThe Law Society's application for disciplinary action was granted, prohibiting the Respondent from applying for a practicing certificate for two years. Costs of the proceedings were awarded to the Law Society (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Law Society v Ravi Madasamy: Misconduct Investigation of Non-Practicing Solicitor 28 Apr 2015 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	28 Apr 2015	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedLaw Society's application for leave to appoint a Disciplinary Tribunal was granted.
6	International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems: Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute 17 Oct 2013 International Research Corp PLC (Appellant)Won	17 Oct 2013	International Research Corp PLC (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine and/or adjudicate upon the dispute between the Appellant and the Respondent arising out of the Supplemental Agreements. Disbursements and fees paid in the arbitration were to be indemnified by the Respondent. The costs of the arbitration were to be paid to the Appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.