Tan Xin Ya

Tan Xin Ya is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in natural forum and winding up. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and conspiracy by unlawful means.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Xin Ya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Xin Ya has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Rotary Engineering v Kioumji & Eslim: Forum Non Conveniens and Stay of Proceedings(Mar 2017) Ting Shwu Ping v Scanone Pte Ltd: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Ground(Nov 2016) Kioumji & Eslim v Rotary Engineering: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law(Oct 2016)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	The Wave Studio v. General Hotel Management: Copyright Infringement & Hotel Photography(Jun 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Xin Ya's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 5 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.5 parties avg	4.5	80%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Xin Ya's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Wave Studio v. General Hotel Management: Copyright Infringement & Hotel Photography 15 Jun 2022 General Hotel Management, Ltd (Defendant)Lost	15 Jun 2022	General Hotel Management, Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Rotary Engineering v Kioumji & Eslim: Forum Non Conveniens and Stay of Proceedings 20 Mar 2017 Yahya Lutfi Khader (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	20 Mar 2017	Yahya Lutfi Khader (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs to be paid to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ting Shwu Ping v Scanone Pte Ltd: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Ground 28 Nov 2016 TING SHWU PING (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2016	TING SHWU PING (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Kioumji & Eslim v Rotary Engineering: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law 06 Oct 2016 Yahya Lutfi Khader (Plaintiff)Won	06 Oct 2016	Yahya Lutfi Khader (Plaintiff): Application for stay dismissedThe plaintiff successfully opposed the defendant's application to stay the proceedings in Singapore.
5	Ting Shwu Ping v Autopack Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application and Buy-Out Provision under Companies Act 21 Jan 2016 TING SHWU PING (ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHNG KOON SENG, DECEASED) (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jan 2016	TING SHWU PING (ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHNG KOON SENG, DECEASED) (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application to wind up the defendant companies was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the Defendants.