Tan Yi Fan

Tan Yi Fan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and assessment of costs. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Express Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness and Proportionality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Charge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Yi Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Yi Fan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Reliance Infrastructure v Shanghai Electric: SICC Rules on Costs Assessment(Apr 2024) Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trust, Security Interest & Contract Breach(Jul 2023) Ma Binxiang v Hainan Hui Bang: Contract Formation & Standard of Proof(Oct 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Yi Fan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Yi Fan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	65,000.00	32,500.002 cases	2
USD	734,660.02	734,660.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Reliance Infrastructure v Shanghai Electric: SICC Rules on Costs Assessment 15 Apr 2024 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2024	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant): Costs AwardedShanghai Electric was awarded costs in the amount of US$734,660.02, a reduction from the costs claimed by them of US$911,244.87.
2	Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trust, Security Interest & Contract Breach 27 Jul 2023 Acute Result Holdings Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jul 2023	Acute Result Holdings Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety; ordered to pay CGS-CIMB costs of S$65,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ma Binxiang v Hainan Hui Bang: Contract Formation & Standard of Proof 26 Oct 2022 Ma Binxiang (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	26 Oct 2022	Ma Binxiang (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe court overturned the Judge’s finding that the Investment Agreement exists and set aside his orders for Mr Ma to return the Sum and Investment Returns to HHBC and for the Investment Returns to be assessed. The court also set aside the Judge’s order for Mr Ma to return the RMB680,000 allegedly paid to him in reimbursement of part of his personal income taxes and the order for the assessment of the remuneration and expenses of Mr Ma.
4	Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trusts, Negligence & Duty of Care 27 Feb 2022 Acute Result Holdings Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Acute Result Holdings Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed in its entirety.
5	Hainan Hui Bang v Ma Binxiang: Investment Agreement Dispute under PRC Law 17 Jan 2022 Ma Binxiang (Defendant)Lost	17 Jan 2022	Ma Binxiang (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.