Tan Yi Liang

Tan Yi Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and construction law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yi Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Yi Liang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Prolegis LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	STS Seatoshore Group v Wansa Commodities: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute(Oct 2024) Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute(Oct 2024) MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation(Oct 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Yi Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Yi Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	34,000.00	17,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	STS Seatoshore Group v Wansa Commodities: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 21 Oct 2024 Wansa Commodities Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	21 Oct 2024	Wansa Commodities Pte Ltd (Defendant): Inquiry as to Damages DeclinedWansa's request for an inquiry as to damages was declined.
2	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 09 Oct 2024 Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2024	Argyle Fund Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts awarded in favour of Argyle and fixed at $34,000, to be borne by Mdm Lee and Mr Lim on a joint and several basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation 08 Oct 2024 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	08 Oct 2024	KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Striking Out Set AsideStriking out of KTP as a party was set aside, and the MCST was awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.