Tan Yue Shuen Alvin

Tan Yue Shuen Alvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and inducement of breach of contract. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Real Estate	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Right of first refusal	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Yue Shuen Alvin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Bumi Armada v Tozzi: Right of First Refusal & Inducement of Breach of Contract Dispute(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Yue Shuen Alvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Yue Shuen Alvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bumi Armada v Tozzi: Right of First Refusal & Inducement of Breach of Contract Dispute 05 Aug 2018 Bumi Armada Berhad (Appellant, Defendant)Won	05 Aug 2018	Bumi Armada Berhad (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in fullThe court found that BAB is not liable on the tort of inducing BAOHL’s breach of contract.