Tan Zhengxian Jordan

Tan Zhengxian Jordan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated expertise across 58 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Handwriting Analysis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Counter-restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of Court 2021	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oaths and Declarations Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Zhengxian Jordan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Zhengxian Jordan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Audent Chambers LLC	9 cases	100% of cases	Sentek Marine v MPA Singapore: Judicial Review of Bunkering License Non-Renewal(Aug 2024) Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties(Jan 2024) Peloso v Kumar: Striking Out Claim Based on Unsustainable Expert Evidence(Oct 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Zhengxian Jordan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.1
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	112.0 parties avg	12.0	11%
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	44%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	11%
Partial	28.7 parties avg	8.7	22%
Won	23.6 parties avg	3.6	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	43.4 parties avg	3.4
2024	210.6 parties avg	10.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Zhengxian Jordan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(10%)	10%
Lost	4(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	2(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	19,566,846.40	19,566,846.401 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2024	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sentek Marine v MPA Singapore: Judicial Review of Bunkering License Non-Renewal 26 Aug 2024 Sentek Marine & Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	26 Aug 2024	Sentek Marine & Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedSentek's application for judicial review of the MPA's decision not to renew its bunkering licenses was dismissed.
2	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties 17 Jan 2024 Amit Shah (Defendant)Dismissed	17 Jan 2024	Amit Shah (Defendant): Counterclaims dismissedJG Jewelry Pte Ltd's counterclaims are dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Peloso v Kumar: Striking Out Claim Based on Unsustainable Expert Evidence 26 Oct 2023 UHP Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 Oct 2023	UHP Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal was allowed, and the claimant's claim was struck out.
4	The Inquiry Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal - Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 05 Sep 2023 The Inquiry Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	05 Sep 2023	The Inquiry Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Correction Directions was dismissed.
5	Wee Ewe Seng v True Yoga: Breach of Employment Contract & Fiduciary Duty 25 Jul 2023 True Fitness Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	25 Jul 2023	True Fitness Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; Mr. Wee is liable for breach of fiduciary duties.
6	DFD v DFE: Joinder of Parties & Setting Aside Arbitral Award 19 Jul 2023 DFF (Defendant)Neutral	19 Jul 2023	DFF (Defendant): Application to add Trustee as party deniedThe court dismissed the Intervention Application and refused permission to the Trustee to participate in the present proceedings in any capacity.
7	Ewe Pang Kooi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Forgery, ODA, and CDSA Offences 01 Dec 2022 Ewe Pang Kooi (Appellant)Lost	01 Dec 2022	Ewe Pang Kooi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the District Court's decision to order the imprisonment sentence to commence upon the expiry of the High Court sentence was dismissed.
8	Goh Chin Soon v Public Prosecutor: Leave to Refer Questions of Law on Amended Charges 10 May 2021 Goh Chin Soon (Applicant, Appellant)Partial	10 May 2021	Goh Chin Soon (Applicant, Appellant): Conviction on amended Passports Act charge set asideThe applicant's conviction on the amended section 47(6) Passports Act charge is set aside and the case is remitted to the State Courts for a re-trial.
9	Ewe Pang Kooi v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust Appeal 02 Mar 2020 Ewe Pang Kooi (Appellant)Lost	02 Mar 2020	Ewe Pang Kooi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.