Tan Zhi Min Ashton

Tan Zhi Min Ashton is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and enforcement of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Zhi Min Ashton has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Zhi Min Ashton has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Breakpoint LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd v Pawan Kumar Jagetia: Breach of Employment Contract & Implied Terms(Apr 2022) Tan Hock Keng v Malaysian Trustees Berhad: Setting Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment Under RECJA(Nov 2021) Malaysian Trustees Bhd v Tan Hock Keng: Registration of Foreign Judgment & Appeal Under Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act(Jun 2021)
Joseph Lopez LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action for Breach of Directors' Duties(Dec 2022) Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action & Cross-Examination(Sep 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Zhi Min Ashton's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.0 parties avg	3.0	100%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	33.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Zhi Min Ashton's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	8,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action for Breach of Directors' Duties 06 Dec 2022 Wavoo Abdusalam Shahul Hameed (Defendant)Lost	06 Dec 2022	Wavoo Abdusalam Shahul Hameed (Defendant): Derivative action allowed in partLeave to bring a derivative action in the name of the Company granted in part against Wavoo. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action & Cross-Examination 19 Sep 2022 Wavoo Abdusalam Shahul Hameed (Defendant)Lost	19 Sep 2022	Wavoo Abdusalam Shahul Hameed (Defendant): Application for leave to cross-examine deniedThe defendant's application for leave to cross-examine the plaintiff was denied.
3	Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd v Pawan Kumar Jagetia: Breach of Employment Contract & Implied Terms 04 Apr 2022 Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Apr 2022	Carlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCarlsberg South Asia Pte Ltd's claim against Mr. Pawan Kumar Jagetia is dismissed.
4	Tan Hock Keng v Malaysian Trustees Berhad: Setting Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment Under RECJA 23 Nov 2021 Tan Hock Keng (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	23 Nov 2021	Tan Hock Keng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay the respondent costs of both the appeal and SUM 26 fixed at $35,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Malaysian Trustees Bhd v Tan Hock Keng: Registration of Foreign Judgment & Appeal Under Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act 29 Jun 2021 Tan Hock Keng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2021	Tan Hock Keng (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against the registration of the consent judgment was dismissed. Ordered to pay costs of $5,000 all-in to the plaintiff. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).