Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar

Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Trident Law Corporation	2 cases	67% of cases	GIL v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty of a Minor(Nov 2024) Liew Michael Marcus v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object, Voluntarily Causing Hurt(Jan 2024)
Charles Lin LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Foo Chee Boon Edward v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Inadequate Medical Records(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	110.0 parties avg	10.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tanaya Shekhar Kinjavdekar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	3,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	GIL v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty of a Minor 05 Nov 2024 GIL (Appellant)Lost	05 Nov 2024	GIL (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
2	Liew Michael Marcus v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object, Voluntarily Causing Hurt 10 Jan 2024 Chan Hui Yi Regina (Appellant)Partial	10 Jan 2024	Chan Hui Yi Regina (Appellant): Convicted of altered charge under s 323 of the Penal CodeFine of $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) for assault on Maureen near Lot 57 and Lot 58.
3	Foo Chee Boon Edward v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Inadequate Medical Records 30 Jan 2020 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2020	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConviction and sentence set aside.