Tang Khin Wai

Tang Khin Wai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in unfair preferences and implied terms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Aesthetic Clinic	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tang Khin Wai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tang Khin Wai has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	3 cases	75% of cases	Show Theatres v Shaw Theatres: Unfair Preference in Company Winding Up(Oct 2002) Show Theatres Pte Ltd v Shaw Theatres: Avoidance of Transactions & Unfair Preference(Mar 2002) Wee Kah Lee v Silverdale Investment: Implied Terms in Loan Agreements for Property Development(Aug 2000)
Tang Khin Wai & Co	1 cases	25% of cases	Ang Ai Tin v Chua Keng Hwee: Breach of Oral Agreements & Settlement Agreement Dispute(Apr 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tang Khin Wai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tang Khin Wai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	668,000.00	668,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Ai Tin v Chua Keng Hwee: Breach of Oral Agreements & Settlement Agreement Dispute 06 Apr 2009 Chua Keng Hwee (Defendant)Partial	06 Apr 2009	Chua Keng Hwee (Defendant): Claim dismissed in partPlaintiff's claim in respect of the two oral agreements is dismissed, but her claim in respect of the settlement agreement for $668,000.00 is allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Show Theatres v Shaw Theatres: Unfair Preference in Company Winding Up 04 Oct 2002 Eng Wah Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Oct 2002	Eng Wah Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, payments received deemed unfair preference and recoverable by the liquidator.
3	Show Theatres Pte Ltd v Shaw Theatres: Avoidance of Transactions & Unfair Preference 27 Mar 2002 Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2002	Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe liquidator's claims against Eng Wah Investments Pte Ltd were dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicant.
4	Wee Kah Lee v Silverdale Investment: Implied Terms in Loan Agreements for Property Development 10 Aug 2000 Wee Kah Lee (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Aug 2000	Wee Kah Lee (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for repayment of loans was dismissed.