Tang Shang Wei

Tang Shang Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in conspiracy by unlawful means and money and moneylenders. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegal moneylending	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Blackmail	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extortion	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tortious Interference	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Shang Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tang Shang Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Liew Kum Chong v SVM International Trading: Sham Transaction, Mistake, Non Est Factum, Unconscionability, Illegal Moneylending(Jul 2019) SH Cogent Logistics v Singapore Agro: Conspiracy to Injure & Reinstatement Dispute(Oct 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tang Shang Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tang Shang Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	800,000.00	800,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liew Kum Chong v SVM International Trading: Sham Transaction, Mistake, Non Est Factum, Unconscionability, Illegal Moneylending 10 Jul 2019 Liew Kum Chong (Plaintiff)Won	10 Jul 2019	Liew Kum Chong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $200,000 against SVM, $100,000 against Feasto, $100,000 against Mizimegah and $400,000 against Scarlett. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	SH Cogent Logistics v Singapore Agro: Conspiracy to Injure & Reinstatement Dispute 14 Oct 2014 Cogent Land Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Oct 2014	Cogent Land Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.