Tang Yuan Jonathan

Tang Yuan Jonathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and schemes of arrangement. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 88% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and insolvency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Moratoria	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed Poll Structure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Convenience Class	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tang Yuan Jonathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tang Yuan Jonathan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	5 cases	63% of cases	Re Zipmex Pte Ltd: Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement & Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Platform Insolvency(Apr 2023) Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute(Dec 2022) Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria and Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Exchange Restructuring(Dec 2022)
Prolegis LLC	3 cases	38% of cases	Zipmex Pte Ltd v Zipmex Asia Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Creditors’ Meeting Resolutions for Substantive Irregularities(Nov 2024) Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act(Jan 2024) Babel Holding Ltd Scheme of Arrangement: Leave to Convene Meeting, Creditor Classification(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tang Yuan Jonathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 7 (88%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.9 parties avg	4.9	38%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	13%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	34.8 parties avg	4.8
2023	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2024	25.1 parties avg	5.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tang Yuan Jonathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Zipmex Pte Ltd v Zipmex Asia Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Creditors’ Meeting Resolutions for Substantive Irregularities 26 Nov 2024 Ellyn Tan Huixian (Respondent)Lost	26 Nov 2024	Ellyn Tan Huixian (Respondent): Appointment VoidAppointment as liquidator of ZAPL declared void.
2	Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 10 Jan 2024 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Lost	10 Jan 2024	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for extension of moratorium dismissed.
3	Babel Holding Ltd Scheme of Arrangement: Leave to Convene Meeting, Creditor Classification 23 Nov 2023 Genesis Global Capital LLC (Non-party)Neutral	23 Nov 2023	Genesis Global Capital LLC (Non-party): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party.
4	Re Zipmex Pte Ltd: Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement & Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Platform Insolvency 05 Apr 2023 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Won	05 Apr 2023	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for extension of time of moratoria was allowed.
5	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute 22 Dec 2022 Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Dec 2022	Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed.
6	Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria and Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Exchange Restructuring 05 Dec 2022 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Partial	05 Dec 2022	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Extension of time allowedExtension of time for the moratoria was granted until 2023-04-02 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Zipmex Group Insolvency: Extension of Moratoria and Substantial Connection to Singapore 16 Aug 2022 Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Won	16 Aug 2022	Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Extension of Moratoria GrantedExtension of moratoria granted until 2 December 2022 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	PetroChina v Ocean Winner: Admiralty in Rem, Moratoriums & Companies Act 14 Jan 2021 Petrochina International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff)Won	14 Jan 2021	Petrochina International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff): Summonses dismissedThe court dismissed the summonses filed by the judicial managers of Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd.