Tania Chin Li Wen

Tania Chin Li Wen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and ad hoc admission.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tania Chin Li Wen has demonstrated expertise across 5 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tania Chin Li Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tania Chin Li Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Tania Chin Li Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tania Chin Li Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tania Chin Li Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tania Chin Li Wen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tania Chin Li Wen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tania Chin Li Wen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Lord Goldsmith: Ad Hoc Admission & Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code 18 Sep 2013 Lord Goldsmith Peter Henry PC QC (Applicant)Lost	18 Sep 2013	Lord Goldsmith Peter Henry PC QC (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for ad hoc admission to the Singapore Bar was dismissed.