Tanya Thomas Vadaketh

Tanya Thomas Vadaketh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unilateral Pricing Defence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reconciliation Defence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Misuse Counterclaim	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tanya Thomas Vadaketh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v J. G. Jewelry: Summary Judgment & Joint Venture Dispute(Jul 2020) CEB v CEC: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract and Public Policy(May 2020)
M & A Law Corporation	2 cases	50% of cases	Mann Holdings v Ung Yoke Hong: Debt Recovery & Loan Dispute over Metahub Shares(Mar 2018) Mann Holdings v Ung Yoke Hong: Forum Non Conveniens & Loan Repayment Dispute(Jun 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tanya Thomas Vadaketh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	75%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	25.7 parties avg	5.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tanya Thomas Vadaketh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	4,000,000.00	4,000,000.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v J. G. Jewelry: Summary Judgment & Joint Venture Dispute 21 Jul 2020 Shree Ramkrishna Exports Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	21 Jul 2020	Shree Ramkrishna Exports Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Unconditional leave to defend granted to DefendantPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was denied; defendant was granted unconditional leave to defend. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CEB v CEC: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract and Public Policy 03 May 2020 CEE (Defendant)Won	03 May 2020	CEE (Defendant): Claim WonDefendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's originating summons to set aside the arbitration award. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mann Holdings v Ung Yoke Hong: Debt Recovery & Loan Dispute over Metahub Shares 22 Mar 2018 Ung Yoke Hong (Defendant)Lost	22 Mar 2018	Ung Yoke Hong (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the sum of RM4 million with interest at 5.33% from the date of the writ of summons (19 June 2015) and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed.
4	Mann Holdings v Ung Yoke Hong: Forum Non Conveniens & Loan Repayment Dispute 07 Jun 2016 Ung Yoke Hong (Defendant)Lost	07 Jun 2016	Ung Yoke Hong (Defendant): Application for stay dismissedThe defendant's application for a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens was dismissed, meaning the case will proceed in Singapore.