Tara Radakrishnan

Tara Radakrishnan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in investment disputes and state immunity. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in private international law and international arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Private International Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
State Immunity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tara Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tara Radakrishnan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Enforcement of Arbitral Award Against a State(May 2017) Re Wordsworth: Ad Hoc Admission for Lesotho's Investor-State Arbitration Challenge(Aug 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tara Radakrishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.8
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	210.8 parties avg	10.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tara Radakrishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Enforcement of Arbitral Award Against a State 07 May 2017 Trustees of the Burmilla Trust (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2017	Trustees of the Burmilla Trust (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to serve order per State Immunity Act.
2	Re Wordsworth: Ad Hoc Admission for Lesotho's Investor-State Arbitration Challenge 28 Aug 2016 Rampai Diamonds (Pty) Limited (Respondent)Lost	28 Aug 2016	Rampai Diamonds (Pty) Limited (Respondent): Application OpposedOpposed the application for ad hoc admission.