Tay Eu-Yen

Tay Eu-Yen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and wills and probate.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Eu-Yen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Eu-Yen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Aug 2024) Lian Tian Yong Johnny v Tan Swee Wan: Appeal on Oral Agreement & Indemnity(Oct 2023) AOS v Estate of AOT: Inheritance Act Claim by Widow After Divorce Proceedings Aborted(May 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Eu-Yen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Eu-Yen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	25,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Star Engineering v Pollisum Engineering: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Aug 2024 Star Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	18 Aug 2024	Star Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedStar Engineering's appeal against the stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration was dismissed.
2	Lian Tian Yong Johnny v Tan Swee Wan: Appeal on Oral Agreement & Indemnity 12 Oct 2023 Kelvin Low Keng Siang (Respondent, Defendant)Dismissed	12 Oct 2023	Kelvin Low Keng Siang (Respondent, Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed; the Kelvin Indemnity does not exist.
3	AOS v Estate of AOT: Inheritance Act Claim by Widow After Divorce Proceedings Aborted 24 May 2012 AOS (Appellant)Lost	24 May 2012	AOS (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no financial provision awarded beyond existing accommodation arrangements.
4	PP v Ang Seng Thor: Corruption Offences, Prevention of Corruption Act, Corporate Governance 25 May 2011 Ang Seng Thor (Respondent)Lost	25 May 2011	Ang Seng Thor (Respondent): Sentence VariedThe sentence was varied to a term of six weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of $25,000 per charge, with both imprisonment terms to run consecutively. The total sentence was therefore 12 weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of $50,000 (SGD, assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore).