Tay Jia En

Tay Jia En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Jia En has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Children	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Priorities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Regulations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Jia En has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	7 cases	78% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CAX: Sexual Offences Against a Child(Mar 2024) PP v Jeffrey Pe: Sexual Assault by Penetration, Intoxication, and Consent(Oct 2023) Mustapah bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault by Oral-Penile Penetration and Sentencing Appeal(Oct 2023)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	22% of cases	Mount Apo v Hanjin Ras Laffan: Collision in Singapore Strait, Traffic Separation Scheme, COLREGS, Apportionment of Liability(Mar 2019) Piraeus Bank SA v Owners of Vessel “Posidon”: Priorities in Admiralty Claims(Jun 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Jia En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	22%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	22%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Jia En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v CAX: Sexual Offences Against a Child 20 Mar 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	20 Mar 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): LostAccused acquitted on all charges.
2	PP v Jeffrey Pe: Sexual Assault by Penetration, Intoxication, and Consent 30 Oct 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Oct 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on all charges.
3	Mustapah bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault by Oral-Penile Penetration and Sentencing Appeal 02 Oct 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Oct 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence partially upheldAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence partially upheld, with the global sentence calibrated downwards to 18 years and 6 months’ imprisonment.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mustapah bin Abdullah: Sexual Assault, Penetration, Consent 18 Oct 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Oct 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused convicted on all charges.
5	BOX v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 17 Years' Imprisonment for Sexual Offences Against Minors 11 Apr 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Apr 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant.
6	BQG v Public Prosecutor: Application for Criminal Reference and Disclosure of Witness Statements 08 Jul 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 Jul 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the application.
7	GDC v Public Prosecutor: Outrage of Modesty Charge Amendment and Sentencing 03 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	03 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original Charge AmendedThe original charge of aggravated outrage of modesty was amended to outrage of modesty simpliciter.
8	Mount Apo v Hanjin Ras Laffan: Collision in Singapore Strait, Traffic Separation Scheme, COLREGS, Apportionment of Liability 07 Mar 2019 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the ship or vessel “HANJIN RAS LAFFAN” (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	07 Mar 2019	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the ship or vessel “HANJIN RAS LAFFAN” (Defendant, Plaintiff): Counterclaim apportionedResponsibility for the collision is apportioned 60:40 in favor of Hanjin Ras Laffan. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Piraeus Bank SA v Owners of Vessel “Posidon”: Priorities in Admiralty Claims 06 Jun 2017 World Fuel Services Trading DMCC (Interveners)Lost	06 Jun 2017	World Fuel Services Trading DMCC (Interveners): Challenge to prayer 4 of both summonses failsThe interveners' challenge to prayer 4 of both SUM 4072 and SUM 4073 fails.