Tay Kang-Rui Darius

Tay Kang-Rui Darius is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in insolvency law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Insolvency Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation Funding	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transactions Defrauding Creditors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Group Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Kang-Rui Darius has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Kang-Rui Darius has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
BlackOak LLC	5 cases	83% of cases	Xu Wei Dong v Midas Holdings Ltd: Disclosure Order for Audit Documents under Companies Act(Oct 2022) Rajagopalan v The Wellness Group: Liquidator's Power to Compromise Debts(Nov 2020) Rooftop Group International: Recognition of US Chapter 11 Proceedings under UNCITRAL Model Law(Dec 2019)
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	17% of cases	Re Vanguard Energy: Validity of Litigation Funding in Insolvency; Companies Act s 272(2)(c), Maintenance and Champerty(Jun 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Kang-Rui Darius's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.1
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	17%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	17%
Won	510.0 parties avg	10.0	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2018	215.5 parties avg	15.5
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Kang-Rui Darius's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	5(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xu Wei Dong v Midas Holdings Ltd: Disclosure Order for Audit Documents under Companies Act 30 Oct 2022 Xu Wei Dong (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2022	Xu Wei Dong (Plaintiff): Order grantedOrder granted for the disclosure of documents relating to audits carried out by Mazars LLP and Mazars CPA Limited on Midas Holdings Limited for the financial years ended 2012 to 2017.
2	Rajagopalan v The Wellness Group: Liquidator's Power to Compromise Debts 09 Nov 2020 Jotangia Paresh Tribhovan (Applicant)Won	09 Nov 2020	Jotangia Paresh Tribhovan (Applicant): Application GrantedApplication to approve the Settlement Deed was granted.
3	Rooftop Group International: Recognition of US Chapter 11 Proceedings under UNCITRAL Model Law 02 Dec 2019 Darren Scott Matloff (Applicant)Won	02 Dec 2019	Darren Scott Matloff (Applicant): Recognition as foreign representativeDarren Scott Matloff recognized as the foreign representative of Rooftop Group International Pte Ltd.
4	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement 26 Nov 2018 IMSPL Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2018	IMSPL Pte Ltd (Applicant): Moratorium Relief GrantedMoratorium relief granted to IMSPL Pte Ltd.
5	Jurong Aromatics v BP Singapore: Insolvency Set-Off & Assignment Dispute 02 Oct 2018 Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2018	Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Re Vanguard Energy: Validity of Litigation Funding in Insolvency; Companies Act s 272(2)(c), Maintenance and Champerty 08 Jun 2015 Re Vanguard Energy Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	08 Jun 2015	Re Vanguard Energy Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application grantedApplication for approval of the Assignment Agreement was granted.