Tay Ming Xun

Tay Ming Xun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and payment claims. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Pay when paid provisions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Payment Claims	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Standard form contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Singapore Institute of Architects standard form contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
REDAS Design and Build Conditions of Main Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Ming Xun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Ming Xun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Veritas Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	CEQ v CER: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act(Apr 2020) Min Hawk Pte Ltd v SCB Building Construction Pte Ltd: Interpretation of Payment Terms in Sub-Contract(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Ming Xun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Ming Xun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	286,641.56	143,320.782 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CEQ v CER: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 05 Apr 2020 CEQ (Applicant)Lost	05 Apr 2020	CEQ (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside adjudication determination was dismissed.
2	Min Hawk Pte Ltd v SCB Building Construction Pte Ltd: Interpretation of Payment Terms in Sub-Contract 19 Jan 2020 Min Hawk Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jan 2020	Min Hawk Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $286,641.56, with interest of 5.33% per annum accruing as of 28 May 2018 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).