Tay Shi Ing

Tay Shi Ing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in schemes of arrangement and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Group Restructuring	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Shi Ing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Shi Ing has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	MAN Diesel v IM Skaugen: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction(Dec 2019) IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Shi Ing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.7
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	119.0 parties avg	19.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Shi Ing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	100,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MAN Diesel v IM Skaugen: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 03 Dec 2019 MAN Diesel & Turbo Norge AS (Appellant)Won	03 Dec 2019	MAN Diesel & Turbo Norge AS (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; respondents to pay appellants costs of the appeal, the two applications for leave to adduce further evidence and the application for leave to appeal, fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. The costs orders below shall be reversed in favor of the appellants. The usual consequential orders, if any, will apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement 26 Nov 2018 MAN Energy Solutions SE (Respondent)Lost	26 Nov 2018	MAN Energy Solutions SE (Respondent): Application UnsuccessfulMAN Energy Solutions SE's opposition to the moratorium relief was unsuccessful.