Teh Shi Ying

Teh Shi Ying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and company law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pulmonary Fat Embolism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liposuction Complications	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pricing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teh Shi Ying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teh Shi Ying has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	10 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation(Dec 2020) Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure(Nov 2020) Kiri Industries v DyStar Global Holdings: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teh Shi Ying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 6 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	10%
Lost	45.7 parties avg	5.7	40%
Neutral	36.3 parties avg	6.3	30%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	44.5 parties avg	4.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	65.8 parties avg	5.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teh Shi Ying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(7%)	7%
Lost	4(29%)	29%
Neutral	3(21%)	21%
Partial	2(14%)	14%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	3,750.004 cases	4
USD	1,356,961.00	1,356,961.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	10 13321	Dismissed: 1 cases (10.0%) Lost: 3 cases (30.0%) Neutral: 3 cases (30.0%) Partial: 2 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (10.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Dec 2020	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be purchased by DefendantSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. The final amount is to be determined based on the adjustments outlined in the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure 25 Nov 2020 Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd (Third Party)Dismissed	25 Nov 2020	Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd (Third Party): Claim DismissedThird party claim against Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd was discontinued.
3	Kiri Industries v DyStar Global Holdings: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete 18 Oct 2020 Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Appellant)Partial	18 Oct 2020	Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; damages calculation adjusted in favor of Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri. Kiri to obtain 50% of the costs of its appeal. No change to the assessment of DyStar's costs below. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	DyStar Global Holdings v. Kiri Industries: Assessment of Damages and Costs for Breach of Contract 02 Mar 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant)Neutral	02 Mar 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant): NeutralNo specific orders made against this defendant in this judgment.
5	Senda International Capital v Kiri Industries: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Feb 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim)Neutral	11 Feb 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.
6	DyStar v Kiri: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete in Dye Industry 08 Jan 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant)Neutral	08 Jan 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party in the provided text.
7	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: HDB Flat Compulsory Acquisition for Unauthorized Subletting 29 Nov 2015 Housing and Development Board (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2015	Housing and Development Board (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe HDB's decision to compulsorily acquire the flat was upheld.
8	Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: Quashing Order Refused for HDB's Compulsory Acquisition of Flat Due to Illegal Subletting 21 Dec 2014 Housing and Development Board (Respondent)Won	21 Dec 2014	Housing and Development Board (Respondent): Successful DefenceApplication for leave to file an application for a quashing order was dismissed. Applicants to pay costs of $15,000 and disbursements amounting to $7,000 to HDB. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	International Research Corp PLC v Lufthansa Systems: Arbitration Jurisdiction Dispute 17 Oct 2013 Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	17 Oct 2013	Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Tribunal did have jurisdiction to determine and/or adjudicate upon the dispute between the Appellant and the Respondent arising out of the Supplemental Agreements. The disbursements and fees paid in the arbitration were to be indemnified by the Respondent. The costs of the arbitration were to be paid to the Appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	IRCP v Lufthansa: Challenge to Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction over Supplemental Agreement 11 Nov 2012 Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	11 Nov 2012	Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedIRCP's application challenging the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction was dismissed.