Teng Po Yew

Teng Po Yew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and shares. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 48% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teng Po Yew has demonstrated expertise across 73 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	13 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs against non-party	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint and several liability for costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housing Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Furniture Rebate Plan	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ethical impropriety	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pricing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Romantic Relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teng Po Yew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teng Po Yew has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	15 cases	71% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute(Mar 2023) UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale(Oct 2022) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal(Jul 2022)
Premier Law LLC	4 cases	19% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019) Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act(Dec 2017) United Overseas Bank v Lippo Marina Collection: Discovery, Litigation & Without Prejudice Privilege(Jun 2017)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	2 cases	10% of cases	Shenzhen Kenouxin v Heliyanto: Agency, Contract Breach & Agent's Liabilities(Jul 2016) Wee Cheng Swee v Jo Baby: Loan vs Gift Dispute over Property & Car Purchase(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teng Po Yew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 10 (48%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5%
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	14%
Neutral	63.0 parties avg	3.0	29%
Partial	45.0 parties avg	5.0	19%
Won	74.7 parties avg	4.7	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	36.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	55.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	73.1 parties avg	3.1
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teng Po Yew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	3(14%)	14%
Neutral	6(29%)	29%
Partial	4(19%)	19%
Won	7(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,242,642.11	1,030,330.268 cases	8
USD	678,480.50	226,160.173 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	5 1112	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2021	7 1132	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 1 cases (14.3%) Neutral: 3 cases (42.9%) Won: 2 cases (28.6%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute 02 Mar 2023 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	02 Mar 2023	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe judgment does not specify a direct outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
2	UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale 27 Oct 2022 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2022	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Lippo is liable to pay damages to UOB, the quantum of which will be determined at the assessment of damages. UOB awarded 70% of the costs of the appeal which we assess to be $70,000. 70% of that is $49,000. This does not include disbursements of the appeal for which UOB claims $45,256.04 because of voluminous documents. However, a substantial part of the documents was not necessary for CA 67 as they were repeat documents which were common to the purchasers. UOB should have sought directions whether they could have used sample documents instead. In the circumstances, this court awards UOB $10,000 for disbursements of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal 05 Jul 2022 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	05 Jul 2022	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): NeutralNeutral outcome. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party 26 Dec 2021 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	26 Dec 2021	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	UOB v Lippo Marina: Deceit & Conspiracy in Housing Loans for Marina Collection Units 07 Dec 2021 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	07 Dec 2021	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd were dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
6	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 07 Dec 2021 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Dec 2021	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paidDyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to pay costs of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital Management: Fiduciary Duties & Investment Agreement Dispute 23 Aug 2021 Gerald Yeo (Respondent, Defendant)Won	23 Aug 2021	Gerald Yeo (Respondent, Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims against Gerald Yeo were dismissed with costs fixed at $36,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar 20 Jun 2021 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	20 Jun 2021	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe judgment pertains to the valuation of shares in DyStar.
9	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & Oppression 02 Jun 2021 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	02 Jun 2021	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralOutcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is neutral (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital: Agent's Duties & Investment Advice 15 Feb 2021 One Tree Capital Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Feb 2021	One Tree Capital Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claims dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	20 Dec 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is neutral, as it is the subject of the share valuation. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Tan Ng Kuang v Law Society: Disciplinary Proceedings & Professional Conduct 18 Jun 2020 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	18 Jun 2020	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application GrantedApplication granted; Law Society directed to apply for appointment of Disciplinary Tribunals.
13	DyStar Global Holdings v. Kiri Industries: Assessment of Damages and Costs for Breach of Contract 02 Mar 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Mar 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of USD 678,480.50.
14	Senda International Capital v Kiri Industries: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Feb 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	11 Feb 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Partial success in Suit 3Awarded 50% of the costs of its claim in Suit 3 against Kiri and Mr Manish.
15	DyStar v Kiri: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete in Dye Industry 08 Jan 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jan 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded to DyStar for Kiri's breach of contract; quantum to be calculated. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Mar 2019 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	11 Mar 2019	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim Allowed in PartInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for DyStar against Kiri for breach of cll 15.1(a) and (b) of the SSSA. DyStar was entitled to 10% of the costs of its claim against Kiri. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
17	Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act 18 Dec 2017 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 Dec 2017	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantPlaintiff's application dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay costs of SGD 10,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	United Overseas Bank v Lippo Marina Collection: Discovery, Litigation & Without Prejudice Privilege 14 Jun 2017 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2017	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to discover Affidavit dismissedApplication for specific discovery of the Affidavit was dismissed on the ground of litigation privilege.
19	UOB v Lippo Marina: Discovery & Litigation Privilege in Fraud & Conspiracy Suit 18 Jan 2017 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	18 Jan 2017	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application granted in partThe first defendant's application for specific discovery was granted in part, but not for the Affidavit.
20	Shenzhen Kenouxin v Heliyanto: Agency, Contract Breach & Agent's Liabilities 20 Jul 2016 Heliyanto (Defendant)Won	20 Jul 2016	Heliyanto (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant is dismissed with costs to be taxed in a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Wee Cheng Swee v Jo Baby: Loan vs Gift Dispute over Property & Car Purchase 24 May 2015 Wee Cheng Swee Henry (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	24 May 2015	Wee Cheng Swee Henry (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partPlaintiff's appeal was allowed in part. The defendant’s leave to defend claims 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 was conditional on furnishing security to the plaintiff for the amount of $398,300. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore, where the judgment was issued.