Teo Guan Teck

Teo Guan Teck is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and damages. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Guan Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Guan Teck has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Guan Teck & Lim	4 cases	100% of cases	JSD Corp v Tri-Line Express: Damages for Vehicle Damage & Cost of Cure(Sep 2022) Lu Yuan Sheng v Hitachi Credit: Bankruptcy Petition Dismissed for Improper Service of Statutory Demand(Jun 2004) Wu Fu Ping v Ong Beng Seng: Interpreting Indemnity Clauses in Consent Order(Jan 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Guan Teck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Guan Teck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JSD Corp v Tri-Line Express: Damages for Vehicle Damage & Cost of Cure 18 Sep 2022 Tri-Line Express Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Sep 2022	Tri-Line Express Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part, with JSD Corporation Pte Ltd succeeding in claiming the outstanding repair costs in relation to the 1976 BMW, 1977 BMW and the spare parts. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lu Yuan Sheng v Hitachi Credit: Bankruptcy Petition Dismissed for Improper Service of Statutory Demand 03 Jun 2004 Hitachi Credit Singapore Pte Ltd (Creditor)Lost	03 Jun 2004	Hitachi Credit Singapore Pte Ltd (Creditor): Bankruptcy Petition DismissedBankruptcy petition dismissed due to improper service of the statutory demand.
3	Wu Fu Ping v Ong Beng Seng: Interpreting Indemnity Clauses in Consent Order 28 Jan 2001 Wu Fu Ping (Appellant)Won	28 Jan 2001	Wu Fu Ping (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with costs and the usual consequential orders. The Ongs must indemnify Wu and Thia accordingly.
4	Wu Fu Ping v Ong Beng Seng: Interpretation of Consent Order in Business Partnership Dispute 28 Jun 2000 Thia Tong Meng (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Jun 2000	Thia Tong Meng (Plaintiff): Claim partially allowedPlaintiffs' claim for indemnity partially allowed; some claimed liabilities were allowed, while others were disallowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).