Teo Hui Xian Astrid

Teo Hui Xian Astrid is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings and overcharging.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and disciplinary proceedings.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Hui Xian Astrid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Hui Xian Astrid has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee Swee Teow LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Syn Kok Kay: Disciplinary Proceedings for Overcharging and Non-Compliance with Court Order(Jan 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Hui Xian Astrid's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Hui Xian Astrid's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	10,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society of Singapore v Syn Kok Kay: Disciplinary Proceedings for Overcharging and Non-Compliance with Court Order 09 Jan 2023 Syn Kok Kay (Respondent)Lost	09 Jan 2023	Syn Kok Kay (Respondent): SanctionedSanctioned; suspension of three years and nine months, commencing upon discharge from bankruptcy. Ordered to pay costs to the applicant fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.