Teo Jason

Teo Jason is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Jason has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ancillary disclosure orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Champerty and maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cost-proofing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Algorithmic Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Worldwide Freezing Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Jason has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Jason has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	60% of cases	POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit(Feb 2022) POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty(Feb 2022) Quoine Pte Ltd v B2C2 Ltd: Algorithmic Trading, Unilateral Mistake & Cryptocurrency(Feb 2020)
Setia Law LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Beltran v Terraform Labs: Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreements & Online Contracts(Nov 2023) Novo Nordisk A/S v KBP Biosciences: Worldwide Mareva Injunction for New York Arbitration(Feb 2025)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Jason's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Jason's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Novo Nordisk A/S v KBP Biosciences: Worldwide Mareva Injunction for New York Arbitration 13 Feb 2025 Novo Nordisk A/S (Claimant)Won	13 Feb 2025	Novo Nordisk A/S (Claimant): Worldwide freezing order grantedWorldwide freezing order granted against the defendants.
2	Beltran v Terraform Labs: Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreements & Online Contracts 29 Nov 2023 Nikolaos Alexandros Platias (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2023	Nikolaos Alexandros Platias (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
3	POA Recovery v Yau Kwok Seng: Illegality, Public Policy, Maintenance, Champerty, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Deceit 17 Feb 2022 POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Neutral	17 Feb 2022	POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Judgment under the sub-heading of “Champerty and maintenance” remainsThe court's decision regarding champerty and maintenance remains unchanged despite the clarification on the security for costs.
4	POA Recovery Pte Ltd v Yau Kwok Seng: Investment Fraud, Maintenance, and Champerty 02 Feb 2022 POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Feb 2022	POA Recovery Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedPOA Recovery is to bear the costs of AD 26, fixed at S$85,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Quoine Pte Ltd v B2C2 Ltd: Algorithmic Trading, Unilateral Mistake & Cryptocurrency 23 Feb 2020 B2C2 Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Feb 2020	B2C2 Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for Respondent on breach of contract claimJudgment for Respondent on breach of contract claim