Teo Jun Wei Andre

Teo Jun Wei Andre is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and criminal law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Investment Holding	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Jun Wei Andre has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Jun Wei Andre has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	4 cases	80% of cases	Heng Tze Yong v Public Prosecutor: Corruption Offenses & Sentencing Appeal(Sep 2017) OCBC Capital Investment v Wong: Contract Formation & Risk Participation Agreement(Sep 2012) Monié v APRIL Management: Interpretation of Employment Agreement & Accrued Obligations(Aug 2012)
Francis Khoo & Lim	1 cases	20% of cases	Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Jun Wei Andre's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Jun Wei Andre's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	35,000.00	7,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims 07 May 2024 Haixia Crystal Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 May 2024	Haixia Crystal Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims against this defendant were dismissed.
2	Heng Tze Yong v Public Prosecutor: Corruption Offenses & Sentencing Appeal 13 Sep 2017 Heng Tze Yong (Appellant)Won	13 Sep 2017	Heng Tze Yong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment term was substituted with a fine of $35,000 (Singapore Dollars).
3	OCBC Capital Investment v Wong: Contract Formation & Risk Participation Agreement 27 Sep 2012 Wong Hua Choon (Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2012	Wong Hua Choon (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Respondent liable for costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	Monié v APRIL Management: Interpretation of Employment Agreement & Accrued Obligations 06 Aug 2012 APRIL Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	06 Aug 2012	APRIL Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff the six sums set out in Appendix B to the Agreement on the dates prescribed therein commencing on 2 March 2012 and ending on 1 April 2013. The defendant is also ordered to pay the plaintiff interest on any late payment of any of the sums from the date each is due to the date of payment at the usual rate. In addition, the defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff costs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	OCBC Capital Investment v Wong Hua Choon: Oral Agreement & Intention to Be Bound 02 Feb 2012 Wong Hua Choon (Defendant)Won	02 Feb 2012	Wong Hua Choon (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Wong Hua Choon was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.