Teo Pei Rong Grace

Teo Pei Rong Grace is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences against Minors	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Pei Rong Grace has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Pei Rong Grace has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	67% of cases	Mohamed Ardlee v PP: Aggravated Outrage of Modesty Sentencing Appeal(Jul 2022) GCM v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Offences Against Minors & Sentencing(Jan 2021)
Attorney-General’s Chamber	1 cases	33% of cases	Gunasilan Rajenthiran v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Pei Rong Grace's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Pei Rong Grace's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohamed Ardlee v PP: Aggravated Outrage of Modesty Sentencing Appeal 18 Jul 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
2	Gunasilan Rajenthiran v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 Feb 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Feb 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction and Sentence UpheldThe court upheld the conviction and sentence imposed by the Judge.
3	GCM v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Offences Against Minors & Sentencing 24 Jan 2021 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Won	24 Jan 2021	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed.