Teo Sher Min

Teo Sher Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Sher Min has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and divorce.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penalty Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Sher Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Sher Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Nanyang Medical Investments v Kuek Bak Kim: Contractual Interpretation & Default Call Options(Nov 2018) UJF v UJG: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Short Marriage(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Sher Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Sher Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,489,185.90	2,244,592.952 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nanyang Medical Investments v Kuek Bak Kim: Contractual Interpretation & Default Call Options 27 Nov 2018 Nanyang Medical Investments Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	27 Nov 2018	Nanyang Medical Investments Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for specific performance and dividends was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	UJF v UJG: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Short Marriage 17 Jan 2018 UJF (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Jan 2018	UJF (Plaintiff): Division of matrimonial assetsWife received 40% of the matrimonial assets.