Teo Shu Qin

Teo Shu Qin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and property disputes. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contracts and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Land Register	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Interest	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Severance of Joint Tenancy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Shu Qin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Shu Qin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Lee Hwee Khim Rosalind v Lee Sai Khim: Severance of Joint Tenancy and Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Mar 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Shu Qin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Shu Qin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Hwee Khim Rosalind v Lee Sai Khim: Severance of Joint Tenancy and Beneficial Ownership Dispute 24 Mar 2011 Lee Hwee Khim Rosalind (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	24 Mar 2011	Lee Hwee Khim Rosalind (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed. The court found that LSK had a beneficial interest in the property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.