Teo Siqi

Teo Siqi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and sentencing. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Siqi has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Human Rights	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Vexatious litigants	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Siqi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Siqi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	PP v Tan Swim Hong: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Sentencing(Oct 2019) MW Group Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety and Health Act Violation and Sentencing Appeal(Jan 2019) Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection(Oct 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Siqi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Siqi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Tan Swim Hong: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Sentencing 14 Oct 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Oct 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll accused persons were convicted.
2	MW Group Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety and Health Act Violation and Sentencing Appeal 13 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	13 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against sentence allowedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the appeal against the sentence was allowed, reducing the fine from $200,000 to $160,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection 27 Oct 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeals DismissedAppeals dismissed; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Attorney-General v Mah Kiat Seng: Vexatious Litigant, Criminal Conviction Review, Supreme Court of Judicature Act 11 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Plaintiff)Won	11 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Plaintiff): Application GrantedThe Attorney-General's application to declare the defendant a vexatious litigant was granted.