Teo Siu Ming

Teo Siu Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 92.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	12 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	11 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	10 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bail Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Epileptic Seizures	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leave to commence judicial review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Siu Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Siu Ming has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	13 cases	100% of cases	Iskandar v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Guidelines for Guilty Pleas in Drug Trafficking Cases(Nov 2024) GIL v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty of a Minor(Nov 2024) PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Siu Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	122.3 parties avg	2.3	92%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2022	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Siu Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	12(92%)	92%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Iskandar v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Guidelines for Guilty Pleas in Drug Trafficking Cases 27 Nov 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Nov 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Upheld in PartAppeal upheld in part with respect to Farid's sentence.
2	GIL v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty of a Minor 05 Nov 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Nov 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction.
3	PP v Low Sze Song: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe court found both accused guilty of the charges.
4	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's motion.
5	Muhammad Feroz Khan v Public Prosecutor: Bail Application for Accused with Epilepsy 13 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for bail was dismissed.
6	Chong Hoon Cheong v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Jul 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Jul 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction and Sentence UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the appellant's conviction and the mandatory death penalty imposed upon him.
7	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed.
8	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	20 Apr 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Attorney-General was dismissed.
9	Public Prosecutor v A Steven s/o Paul Raj: Trafficking in Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of trafficking in diamorphine.
10	Public Prosecutor v. Chong Hoon Cheong: Trafficking Charge under Misuse of Drugs Act 12 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	12 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and sentenced to death.
11	PP v Mohamad Isham: Trafficking Diamorphine, Chain of Custody Dispute 01 Aug 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Aug 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionIsham is convicted of the Charge.
12	Mohammad Rizwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, Adducing Fresh Evidence 07 May 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 May 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Rizwan's conviction and sentence.
13	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Certificate of Substantive Assistance 23 Apr 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	23 Apr 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.