Teo Wei Ling

Teo Wei Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in companies act and performance bond. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Renunciation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of condition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Requirements for waiver by election	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Communication of choice to affirm contract in clear and unequivocal terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Wei Ling has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	Reignwood v Opus Tiger: Joinder Application in Derivative Action(Jun 2021) Tractors Singapore Ltd v Pacific Ocean Engineering: Implied Contractual Terms & Repudiatory Breach(Mar 2020) Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Wei Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	44.3 parties avg	4.3	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Wei Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11,174,300.00	11,174,300.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Reignwood v Opus Tiger: Joinder Application in Derivative Action 22 Jun 2021 Reignwood International Investment (Group) Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jun 2021	Reignwood International Investment (Group) Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Leave to commence derivative proceedings grantedReignwood was granted leave to commence derivative proceedings against Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd.
2	Tractors Singapore Ltd v Pacific Ocean Engineering: Implied Contractual Terms & Repudiatory Breach 25 Mar 2020 Tractors Singapore Limited (Plaintiff)Won	25 Mar 2020	Tractors Singapore Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for S$11,174,300 (Singapore Dollars) and US$536,945 (United States Dollars). Assumed SGD for the Singapore claim as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement 19 Feb 2019 HealthSTATS International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Feb 2019	HealthSTATS International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence the derivative action is dismissed.
4	Sunrise Industries v PT OKI Pulp: Performance Bond Dispute & Fraud Exception 20 Jun 2018 PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills (Defendant)Won	20 Jun 2018	PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills (Defendant): Injunctions set asidePT OKI succeeded in setting aside the injunctions obtained by Sunrise.
5	BAF v BAG: Stay of Court Proceedings and Terms for Grant of Stay in Arbitration 06 Nov 2016 BAF (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Nov 2016	BAF (Plaintiff): Conditional Stay GrantedStay of proceedings granted subject to the condition that the plaintiff was at liberty to serve interrogatories on the second defendant.