Terence

Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Terence has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Incomplete Gifts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Management Corporation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Terence has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Smart Property Management v Management Corp: Breach of Contract & Managing Agent Duties(Sep 2022) WDS v WDT: Dispute over US$1.5 Million Gift to Deceased's Daughter(May 2022) AIX Engineering v Yeong Wai Teck: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Authority in Construction Disputes(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	153,872.14	153,872.141 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Smart Property Management v Management Corp: Breach of Contract & Managing Agent Duties 13 Sep 2022 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4375 (Respondent)Partial	13 Sep 2022	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4375 (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in relation to the Landscape Works and Hoarding Works but allowed in relation to the EM Locks.
2	WDS v WDT: Dispute over US$1.5 Million Gift to Deceased's Daughter 24 May 2022 WDS (Plaintiff)Won	24 May 2022	WDS (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDeclaration that WDT does not have a valid claim for US$1.5 million as a creditor against the Deceased’s estate granted. Plaintiff permitted to distribute the assets of the Deceased’s estate in accordance with the Deceased’s last Will and Testament without regard for WDT’s claim for the sum of US$1.5 million.
3	AIX Engineering v Yeong Wai Teck: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Authority in Construction Disputes 17 May 2021 Aegis Building & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Won	17 May 2021	Aegis Building & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Claim Dismissed, Counterclaim AllowedPlaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed; Aegis is entitled to judgment in the sum of $153,872.14 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from 21 May 2018 to the date of payment.