Terence Seah Yong Guan

Terence Seah Yong Guan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in undue influence and mental capacity law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Terence Seah Yong Guan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Terence Seah Yong Guan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Terence Seah Yong Guan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Terence Seah Yong Guan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies 18 May 2015 Appellants (Appellant)Partial	18 May 2015	Appellants (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, subject to further submissions on the scope of the deputyship and the appointment of deputies.