Terence Tay

Terence Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 86.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Terence Tay has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Domestic Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Transactions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Counterfeit Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outraging Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Terence Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Terence Tay has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	29% of cases	PP v Teo Yeow Chuah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Admissibility of Statements, Capital Punishment Awareness(Dec 2003) Public Prosecutor v Mohd Rasiti: Sexual Offences Against Minor, Attempted Rape(Nov 2001)
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	29% of cases	Smith & Associates v Britestone: Breach of Contract & Damages for Counterfeit Goods(Dec 2006) Smith & Associates v Britestone: Breach of Contract & Damages for Counterfeit Electronic Components(Oct 2006)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Nasser Bin Salleh: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide under Penal Code(Mar 2003)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Raffiq: Murder Conviction Based on Retracted Confession(Mar 2004)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary: Murder Conviction for Pushing Girlfriend from Building(Apr 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Terence Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	86%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Terence Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Won	6(86%)	86%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	604,368.00	302,184.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Smith & Associates v Britestone: Breach of Contract & Damages for Counterfeit Goods 21 Dec 2006 Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	21 Dec 2006	Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $302,184.00 (USD).
2	Smith & Associates v Britestone: Breach of Contract & Damages for Counterfeit Electronic Components 12 Oct 2006 Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Oct 2006	Smith & Associates Far East, Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $302,184 (USD).
3	Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary: Murder Conviction for Pushing Girlfriend from Building 21 Apr 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Apr 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of murder.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Raffiq: Murder Conviction Based on Retracted Confession 16 Mar 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	16 Mar 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder.
5	PP v Teo Yeow Chuah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Admissibility of Statements, Capital Punishment Awareness 05 Dec 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Dec 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on the charge and sentenced according to the law.
6	Public Prosecutor v Nasser Bin Salleh: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide under Penal Code 24 Mar 2003 Nasser Bin Salleh (Defendant)Lost	24 Mar 2003	Nasser Bin Salleh (Defendant): Defendant found guiltyAccused sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
7	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Rasiti: Sexual Offences Against Minor, Attempted Rape 27 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning.