Terence Yeo

Terence Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 78% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Terence Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misrepresentation and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misrepresentation	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of unless order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Advisory	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Terence Yeo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	9 cases	100% of cases	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition(Jan 2025) Law Ching Hung v Aw Eng Hai: Application to Set Aside Rejection of Proof of Debt(Oct 2024) Kingsmen Exhibits v RegalRare Gem Museum: Winding Up Application Under IRDA s 125(1)(e)(Sep 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Terence Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 7 (78%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	64.2 parties avg	4.2	67%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	11%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	22%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	43.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2024	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Terence Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(67%)	67%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	16,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition 26 Jan 2025 Vibrant Group Limited (Claimant)Won	26 Jan 2025	Vibrant Group Limited (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantJudgment for the Claimant; damages to be assessed.
2	Law Ching Hung v Aw Eng Hai: Application to Set Aside Rejection of Proof of Debt 16 Oct 2024 Law Ching Hung (Applicant)Lost	16 Oct 2024	Law Ching Hung (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application to set aside the Notice of Rejection of Proof of Debt was dismissed.
3	Kingsmen Exhibits v RegalRare Gem Museum: Winding Up Application Under IRDA s 125(1)(e) 16 Sep 2024 Kingsmen Exhibits Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	16 Sep 2024	Kingsmen Exhibits Pte Ltd (Claimant): Winding-up order grantedWinding-up order granted against RegalRare Gem Museum Pte Ltd and Kings Luxury Concepts Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore 04 Mar 2024 Luckin Coffee Inc (Applicant)Lost	04 Mar 2024	Luckin Coffee Inc (Applicant): Application for permission to appeal dismissedLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ong Chin Woon v Ong Bee Hah: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Property Ownership Dispute 04 Apr 2023 Ong Chin Woon (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	04 Apr 2023	Ong Chin Woon (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal awarded to the individual respondents fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 11 Oct 2022 Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	11 Oct 2022	Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against setting aside service out of jurisdiction order for the third defendant was dismissed.
7	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Dispute over Jurisdiction in Negligence Claim 03 Jul 2022 Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jul 2022	Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Leave Order set asideThe court set aside the Leave Order, meaning the plaintiff cannot serve the 3rd defendant out of jurisdiction.
8	Public Prosecutor v Shawn Tan Jia Jun: Sentencing for Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Vulnerable Pregnant Victim 06 Apr 2022 Shawn Tan Jia Jun (Respondent)Lost	06 Apr 2022	Shawn Tan Jia Jun (Respondent): Original Sentence OverturnedThe original sentence of a fine was overturned and replaced with a two-week imprisonment sentence.
9	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 31 Mar 2022 Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Mar 2022	Vibrant Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe 2nd Defendant's application to set aside the Leave Orders and stay the proceedings was dismissed.