Tham Feei Sy

Tham Feei Sy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and guarantee. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated expertise across 56 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	7 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Impairment of Security	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Triable Issues	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Account Mandate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
On-demand Bonds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Applicable Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warrants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Endeavours Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Holding out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Feei Sy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tham Feei Sy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	12 cases	100% of cases	Glassberg v UBS AG: Breach of Contract, Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice(Jan 2025) Abdul Rashid v Hii Yii Ann: Forum Non Conveniens & Witness Compellability(Jan 2016) Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tham Feei Sy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.5
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	1011.0 parties avg	11.0	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	214.0 parties avg	14.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	52.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tham Feei Sy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(8%)	8%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Won	10(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	128,499.69	64,249.852 cases	2
USD	66,838,374.08	66,838,374.081 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Glassberg v UBS AG: Breach of Contract, Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice 09 Jan 2025 UBS AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	09 Jan 2025	UBS AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's claims of breach of contract, negligence, and vicarious liability.
2	Abdul Rashid v Hii Yii Ann: Forum Non Conveniens & Witness Compellability 27 Jan 2016 Hii Yii Ann (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2016	Hii Yii Ann (Defendant): Application to stay proceedingsDefendant's application to stay proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens was dismissed.
3	Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision 19 Nov 2014 Bank of China Limited (Singapore Branch) (Plaintiff)Won	19 Nov 2014	Bank of China Limited (Singapore Branch) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for US$66,838,374.08 together with further contractual interest. Assumed USD, as the loan was in USD.
4	Giuffrida Luigi v Julius Baer: Proof of Debt Rejection & Account Transfer Dispute 28 Mar 2010 Bank Julius Baer & Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Mar 2010	Bank Julius Baer & Co Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff to pay half of the costs.
5	Tan Eng Joo v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Guarantee, Statutory Demand, and Bankruptcy Rules 04 Feb 2010 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 Feb 2010	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s application to set aside the defendant’s statutory demand was dismissed.
6	Tan Siew Ling v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Appeal Against Statutory Demand Dismissal 04 Feb 2010 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	04 Feb 2010	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's statutory demand was upheld as the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed.
7	Tan Kheng Chong v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Guarantee, Statutory Demand, and Bankruptcy Rules 04 Feb 2010 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	04 Feb 2010	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's statutory demand was upheld as the appeal was dismissed.
8	Shanghai Electric v PT Merak: Restraining Call on On-Demand Bond under English Law 05 Jan 2010 PT Merak Energi Indonesia (Defendant)Won	05 Jan 2010	PT Merak Energi Indonesia (Defendant): Application allowedApplication to set aside injunction allowed.
9	Abedeen Abdulkader Tyebally v Tyebally Akhtarhusein Hatim: Dispute over Ownership of Reliance Industries Shares 02 Apr 2009 Abedeen Abdulkader Tyebally (Plaintiff)Neutral	02 Apr 2009	Abedeen Abdulkader Tyebally (Plaintiff): Application converted to writ actionApplication converted to writ action.
10	Travista Development v Tan Kim Swee: Breach of Contract & 'Best Endeavours' in Property Sale 30 Dec 2007 Eu Teck Soon (Respondent)Won	30 Dec 2007	Eu Teck Soon (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment in favour of the respondent. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
11	Travista Development v Tan Kim Swee: Breach of Contract & Estoppel in Property Redevelopment 17 Jun 2007 Kwan Mee Sin (Defendant)Won	17 Jun 2007	Kwan Mee Sin (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendants' counterclaim was allowed, rescinding the sale and purchase agreement and forfeiting the deposit.
12	Candid Water Cooler v United Overseas Bank: Completion Date Dispute in Property Sale 15 May 2006 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 May 2006	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of UOB; entitled to $128,499.69 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).