Tham Lijing

Tham Lijing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and criminal law. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 23% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tham Lijing has demonstrated expertise across 118 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Holding out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Salvage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to cooperate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deed of Separation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offshore case	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse Allegations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Sex	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tham Lijing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tham Lijing has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tham Lijing LLC	8 cases	36% of cases	Farooq Ahmad Mann v Xia Zheng: Mareva Injunction, Undervalue Transactions & Matrimonial Assets(Jul 2024) Zhang Lan v La Dolce Vita: Equitable Execution & Trust Dispute(Jun 2023) CYY v. CYZ: Jurisdiction Challenge in Marine Salvage Arbitration(Apr 2023)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	7 cases	32% of cases	Ezion Holdings v Teras Cargo: Shareholder Rights to Financial Info Under Companies Act(Aug 2016) Teras Offshore v Teras Cargo: Offshore Case & Summary Judgment in SICC for Contract Dispute(Jun 2016) Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd: Minority Oppression & Arbitrability(Apr 2016)
Ascendant Legal LLC	3 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Morgan Kupusamy: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2017) L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims & O 57 r 9A(5) Interpretation(Jan 2017) Public Prosecutor v Lee Sze Yong: Kidnapping for Ransom and Statutory Interpretation(Nov 2016)
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Group Practice)	1 cases	5% of cases	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute(Jul 2019)
UniLegal LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution(Feb 2015)
Tham Lijing LLC, Duxton Hill Chambers (Singapore Group Practice)	1 cases	5% of cases	Glassberg v UBS AG: Breach of Contract, Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice(Jan 2025)
Duxton Hill Chambers (Singapore Group Practice)	1 cases	5% of cases	DJO v DJP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tham Lijing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 5 (23%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	92.6 parties avg	2.6	41%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Partial	26.4 parties avg	6.4	9%
Won	103.2 parties avg	3.2	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	24.4 parties avg	4.4
2016	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	35.7 parties avg	5.7
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tham Lijing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(41%)	41%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Won	10(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,341,300.00	1,180,100.0013 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Glassberg v UBS AG: Breach of Contract, Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Investment Advice 09 Jan 2025 Glassberg, Jonathan William (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jan 2025	Glassberg, Jonathan William (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages of US$2,500,000 or damages to be assessed, as well as interest and costs, fails. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
2	DJO v DJP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 14 Aug 2024 DJO (Claimant)Won	14 Aug 2024	DJO (Claimant): Application GrantedThe claimant's application to set aside the arbitration award was granted.
3	Farooq Ahmad Mann v Xia Zheng: Mareva Injunction, Undervalue Transactions & Matrimonial Assets 14 Jul 2024 Farooq Ahmad Mann (in his capacity as the private trustee in bankruptcy of Li Hua) (Claimant)Won	14 Jul 2024	Farooq Ahmad Mann (in his capacity as the private trustee in bankruptcy of Li Hua) (Claimant): Application allowedApplication for a worldwide Mareva injunction was allowed up to S$12.44 million (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Zhang Lan v La Dolce Vita: Equitable Execution & Trust Dispute 26 Jun 2023 Zhang Lan (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2023	Zhang Lan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $35,000 awarded to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	CYY v. CYZ: Jurisdiction Challenge in Marine Salvage Arbitration 17 Apr 2023 CYZ (Respondent)Won	17 Apr 2023	CYZ (Respondent): Jurisdiction upheldThe court held that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the Disputed Claims.
6	UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation 20 Oct 2022 Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Oct 2022	Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Ng Koon Yee Mickey v Mah Sau Cheong: Share Purchase Agreement Termination & Set-Off 29 Sep 2022 Ng Koon Yee Mickey (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Defendant)Won	29 Sep 2022	Ng Koon Yee Mickey (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. Mah Sau Cheong was liable to Ng Koon Yee Mickey for the Tranche 3 Payment. Ng was entitled to judgment for the balance of his counterclaim after the set-off.
8	Nishiki Holdings v Sankaty: Conflict of Interest, Loan Agreements & Valuation 19 Dec 2021 Nishiki International Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Dec 2021	Nishiki International Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appointment of HL China as Appraiser and the HL China Valuation Report is set asideAppointment of HL China as Appraiser and the HL China Valuation Report is set aside. The appointment of the Receivers is consequently invalid and void.
9	CGG v CGH: Appeal on Recovery of Legal Fees in Family Proceedings 22 Aug 2021 CGG (Appellant)Lost	22 Aug 2021	CGG (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay respondent costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000 (all-in) on a standard basis for two solicitors. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal 23 May 2021 Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant)Partial	23 May 2021	Value Monetization III Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; not liable for original judgment debt. Respondents to pay costs fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements for the appeal.
11	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute 25 Jul 2019 Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	25 Jul 2019	Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay the appellant the costs of the appeal and the two applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence in the appeal, namely CA/SUM 38/2019 and CA/SUM 39/2019, fixed at $60,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent shall also bear the costs below fixed at $36,300 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Public Prosecutor v. Morgan Kupusamy: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Feb 2017 Morgan Kupusamy (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2017	Morgan Kupusamy (Defendant): Life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneAccused was sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
13	L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims & O 57 r 9A(5) Interpretation 08 Jan 2017 Maniach Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Jan 2017	Maniach Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the court hearing the oppression action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Public Prosecutor v Lee Sze Yong: Kidnapping for Ransom and Statutory Interpretation 30 Nov 2016 Lee Sze Yong (Accused)Lost	30 Nov 2016	Lee Sze Yong (Accused): Accused ConvictedAccused found guilty of kidnapping for ransom.
15	Ezion Holdings v Teras Cargo: Shareholder Rights to Financial Info Under Companies Act 29 Aug 2016 Teras Cargo Transport Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Won	29 Aug 2016	Teras Cargo Transport Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): Application deniedApplication for financial statements was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Teras Offshore v Teras Cargo: Offshore Case & Summary Judgment in SICC for Contract Dispute 21 Jun 2016 Teras Cargo Transport (America) LLC (Defendant)Lost	21 Jun 2016	Teras Cargo Transport (America) LLC (Defendant): Application for summary judgment dismissedDefendant's application for summary judgment on its counterclaim for reimbursement of freight tax was dismissed.
17	Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd: Minority Oppression & Arbitrability 21 Apr 2016 Maniach Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Apr 2016	Maniach Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedPlaintiff successfully opposed the defendant's application to stay the proceedings in favour of arbitration.
18	ATU v ATY: Defamation Claim for Alleged Child Sexual Abuse at International School 15 Jul 2015 ATX (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jul 2015	ATX (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffAwarded S$40,000 in general damages and S$20,000 in aggravated damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Dispute over Right of Way & Malicious Prosecution 11 Feb 2015 Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	11 Feb 2015	Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to strike out not grantedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff’s action dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Gwee Hak Theng v Public Prosecutor: Commercial Sex with a Minor & Sufficiency of Age Proof 14 Nov 2013 Gwee Hak Theng (Appellant)Lost	14 Nov 2013	Gwee Hak Theng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
21	Law Society v Kurubalan: Champerty, Legal Profession Act, and Professional Misconduct 17 Jul 2013 Kurubalan s/o Manickam Rengaraju (Respondent)Lost	17 Jul 2013	Kurubalan s/o Manickam Rengaraju (Respondent): Suspension from practiceThe Respondent was suspended from practice for six months and ordered to pay costs. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
22	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations 16 May 2013 Teo Wai Cheong (Appellant)Won	16 May 2013	Teo Wai Cheong (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Teo’s counterclaim against the Bank for wrongful liquidation of his assets and for wrongful set off of any cash balances in his account is allowed. The Bank is to pay such sum found to be due to Teo with interest from the date of such wrongful liquidation and/or set off to the date of payment at the rate of 3% per annum. If the account and the extent of any repayment due to Teo cannot be agreed between the parties, the matter is to be remitted to the Retrial Judge for determination. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.